📐 Contents
- 1 · Rigid spheres & geometric foundation
- 2 · Packing in two dimensions
- 3 · Building 3D lattices
- 4 · Close‑packed structures: FCC & HCP
- 5 · Quantitative summary table
- 6 · Interstitial voids (tetrahedral / octahedral)
- 7 · FCC packing factor – full derivation
- 8 · HCP c/a ratio & outlook
- ❓ FAQ & key insights
🔷 Rigid‑sphere model & why geometry matters
In condensed matter physics we often treat atoms as rigid, hard spheres. This classical picture ignores electron‑cloud overlap, yet it provides a powerful geometric foundation for density, symmetry, and mechanical properties. For a senior physics student the goal is to move beyond visualisation into quantitative analysis of \(APF\) and coordination environments.
📐 1. Packing in two dimensions
square packing
Spheres aligned in a grid: each sphere touches four neighbours.
- coordination number \(CN = 4\)
- relatively “loose” arrangement – large interstitial space.
hexagonal close‑packing (2‑D)
Second row nestled into valleys of first row.
- \(CN = 6\)
- most efficient packing of circles on a plane: area coverage ≈ 90.7%
📦 2. From layers to 3‑D crystals
Three‑dimensional structures are built by stacking 2‑D layers. The atomic packing factor is:
simple cubic (SC)
Stack square layers directly on top.
- \(CN = 6\)
- \(APF \approx 0.52\) (rare – polonium only)
body‑centered cubic (BCC)
Corner atoms + one atom at cube centre.
- \(CN = 8\)
- \(APF \approx 0.68\) (Fe, W, Cr…)
🌟 3. The close‑packed structures: FCC & HCP
Stacking hexagonal 2‑D layers yields the maximum possible packing density 0.74 (the Kepler conjecture). The two types differ only in stacking sequence.
🔹 HCP (ABAB…)
Third layer directly above first layer. Hexagonal symmetry.
Examples: Mg, Ti, Zn
🔸 FCC (ABCABC…)
Third layer in “C” voids, fourth repeats. Cubic symmetry.
Examples: Au, Cu, Al
📊 4. Quantitative summary (3‑D lattices)
| Property | Simple cubic | BCC | FCC | HCP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coordination number | 6 | 8 | 12 | 12 |
| Atoms per cell | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 (effective) |
| Atomic radius \(r\) | \(a/2\) | \(\frac{\sqrt{3}a}{4}\) | \(\frac{\sqrt{2}a}{4}\) | \(a/2\) (ideal \(c/a\)) |
| Packing factor (APF) | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
🕳️ 5. Interstitial sites: the gaps
Even close‑packed structures have 26% empty space. Smaller “guest” atoms (carbon in steel) occupy interstitial voids.
- tetrahedral voids (4 atoms) – smaller, more numerous
- octahedral voids (6 atoms) – larger, accommodate solute atoms
In FCC: 4 octahedral sites & 8 tetrahedral sites per unit cell. Void geometry controls alloy solubility and diffusion.
🔬 6. FCC packing factor – full derivation
Step 1: number of atoms in FCC
8 corners × ⅛ + 6 faces × ½ = 1 + 3 = 4 atoms
Step 2: relation between \(a\) and \(r\)
Atoms touch along face diagonal: \(a\sqrt{2} = 4r\)
Step 3: volumes
\(V_{\text{atoms}} = 4 \times \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 = \frac{16}{3}\pi r^3\)
\(V_{\text{cell}} = a^3 = (2\sqrt{2}r)^3 = 16\sqrt{2}\,r^3\)
Step 4: APF ratio
✅ FCC efficiency 74% – maximum for cubic system.
🧊 7. HCP – the “boss fight”
HCP derivation involves the height of the hexagonal prism (\(c/a\) ratio). For ideal close‑packing of spheres, \(c/a = \sqrt{8/3} \approx 1.633\). Then \(APF = \pi/(3\sqrt{2})\) again (same 0.74).
Magnesium and zinc have slight deviations from ideal ratio, affecting ductility.
📌 conclusion
Atomic packing is the bridge between microscopic symmetry and macroscopic physics. Coordination number dictates bonding energy; packing factor influences density, ductility, and void distribution. These real‑space geometries are the physical constraints behind every solid‑state system.
❓ advanced FAQs
The stacking of hexagonal layers follows an ABCABC sequence that repeats every three layers. The overall symmetry of the 3‑D lattice is face‑centered cubic – the unit cell is a cube with atoms on each face.
There are 8 tetrahedral voids per FCC unit cell. Since the cell contains 4 atoms, there are 2 tetrahedral voids per atom. Octahedral voids: 4 per cell → 1 per atom.
It states that no arrangement of identical spheres can have a packing density greater than \(\pi/(3\sqrt{2}) \approx 0.74\). Proven by Hales 1998 (formally 2014). FCC and HCP achieve this bound.
✏️ problem example: BCC packing factor
Show that APF for BCC = 0.68. (Radius relation: body diagonal \( \sqrt{3}a = 4r \))
\(N=2\), \(V_{\text{atoms}}=2\times\frac43\pi r^3\), \(a=4r/\sqrt{3}\). Then \(APF = \frac{8/3\,\pi r^3}{(4r/\sqrt{3})^3} = \frac{\pi\sqrt{3}}{8} \approx 0.68\).
✍️ House of Physics – where matter meets geometry

0 Comments
Have a question or suggestion? Share your thoughts below — we’d love to hear from you!